Arctic Accelero Mono Plus Gtx 1060

• #2

Man, the 670 looks ridiculous with that matter. Plus the VRM's are only cooled by heatsinks which isn't ideal...VRM temps are a big cistron in high overclocks. GPU cooling is half the story.

Become large or go home with water IMO

• #3

Man, the 670 looks ridiculous with that thing. Plus the VRM's are merely cooled past heatsinks which isn't platonic...VRM temps are a big factor in high overclocks. GPU cooling is one-half the story.

Go big or go domicile with water IMO

Yeah, my 670 looks way better with the Twin Turbo Ii :whiste:

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2249721

I would actually similar to see a reference GTX 670 with the Accelero Xtreme 3

• #five

How tin can 2 GPUs that perform within 5-10% of eachother have then different reference PCBs ... weird.

• #half dozen

Yeah, my 670 looks manner better with the Twin Turbo Ii :whiste:

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2249721

I would really like to run into a reference GTX 670 with the Accelero Xtreme Iii

You will never see a 670 or 680 with a accelero farthermost 3 because it doesn't work on reference boards, lol. Kind of ridiculous that they even made a product out of information technology when it only works on boards that have aftermarket coolers already (without stacked power connectors)

Plus for that price is nearly the cost of a cake anyhow....

• #7

You will never see a 670 or 680 with a accelero extreme three because information technology doesn't piece of work on reference boards, lol. Kind of ridiculous that they even made a product out of it when information technology only works on boards that take aftermarket coolers already (without stacked power connectors)

Plus for that price is nearly the price of a block anyhow....

It will work on a reference 670, since it does non have stacked power connectors. However, information technology would wait totally ridiculous

• #8

It will work on a reference 670, since it does not have stacked power connectors. However, it would await totally ridiculous

Hmm, that would exist pretty interesting to see. The farthermost coolers are around eleven inches long if retention serves, how long is the reference 670 PCB? Aesthetics and color scheme are the nearly important things for picking PC components!

• #9

Hmm, that would be pretty interesting to run into. The extreme coolers are around xi inches long if memory serves, how long is the reference 670 PCB? Aesthetics and color scheme are the most important things for picking PC components!

the PCB is just 6.8125-inches long!

• #10

Man, the 670 looks ridiculous with that thing. Plus the VRM's are merely cooled by heatsinks which isn't ideal...VRM temps are a big gene in high overclocks. GPU cooling is half the story.

Go big or become habitation with h2o IMO

The GTX 670 doesn't even take them installed and in the link for the GTX 680 install the guy complained of insufficient cooling for the VRMs.

• #12

I gave thought of using my Xtreme II with my 670 just water is so much easier and space saving

Plus h2o looks better

you should get the swiftech block thats coming out this month. Gabe @ swiftech says it should be prepare soon, and that will be full coverage to cool the VRM's more.

• #13

y'all should become the swiftech block thats coming out this month. Gabe @ swiftech says it should be gear up presently, and that will be full coverage to cool the VRM'southward more.

If the price is right im definitely in for it. Vrms get very hot on this card even with a 120mm fan blowing right on the heatsink.

Any links on it?

• #fourteen

I don't meet a signal for farthermost cooling on GTX 670'south and GTX 680'due south. Unless yous can mod the volts the things won't produce enough heat to really need a monster libation, or even h2o for that matter.

Big coolers would work better on the 7970.

• #15

I don't see a point for farthermost cooling on GTX 670'due south and GTX 680'southward. Unless yous tin mod the volts the things won't produce enough heat to actually need a monster cooler, or even water for that matter.

Big coolers would piece of work ameliorate on the 7970.

Reason is silence and lifespan of card. I'chiliad running The Witcher 2 at only 45c degrees at present, and cannot even hear the Twin Turbo II fans. With stock cooler information technology was terrible loud and 80c LoL!

• #16

I don't see a point for farthermost cooling on GTX 670's and GTX 680's. Unless yous tin can modern the volts the things won't produce enough heat to actually need a monster cooler, or even water for that matter.

Big coolers would work improve on the 7970.

I max out at 36c at 1250 boost cadre with my 670 on ultra. That's why she'south on h2o.

Apr 17, 2006

five,338

476

126

• #17

Don: I concur with your employ of a water cooler. I remember the best alternating libation is a total water block which too addresses the vram heat. Accellero does a dandy chore on the GPU but relies on passive heatsinks for the vram. My experience is that the vram temps are higher with the Accellero cooler than the stock reference cooler eventhough the Accellero does a improve cooling job of the GPU. With the cost of these new video cards and the ability to OC ram ( and the resultant college heats) I would brand certain than the Vram has a amend cooling organization. Thus a FULL h2o block for both the vram and GPU may be the safest way to become if you replace the reference cooler.

Apr 17, 2006

v,338

476

126

• #18

I besides call back part of the problem is that people who use the Accellero merely expect at the GPU temp change and Non the Vram temps. If y'all really search the forums, that'south a reoccurring theme with aftermarket coolers - GPU temp is libation Only if they check the Vram temp information technology is higher.

May 13, 2009

12,333

612

126

• #xix

I also think part of the problem is that people who use the Accellero only look at the GPU temp change and NOT the Vram temps. If you actually search the forums, that's a reoccurring theme with aftermarket coolers - GPU temp is cooler Merely if they bank check the Vram temp it is higher.

The windforce is the only non reference that I know of that cools the vrm, memory, and gpu with the aforementioned heatsink. Even the asus dcii is using passive heatsinks which is fail IMO.

• #21

Infact, a libation like the Accelero Twin Turbo 2 will absurd the RAM much ameliorate VS the stock cooler. Get-go of all I apply heatsinks on all appart from ii chips. Secondly the two Twin Turbo fans blow air all over the PCB to cool the RAM chips even meliorate.

Several years ago I owned a 8800GTX. This carte had temp monitors for many components of the board. vrm's with the stock cooler exceeded 90c and all temps were very high beyond the board. And then I changed to the Thermalright HR03 Plus. This cooler is similar to many of the Arctic Accelero coolers... The temps dropped tremendously beyond the the card. Non just the GPU temp.

Likewise, the GTX 670'due south reference cooler take no cooling of the RAM chips. Only core and bravado hot air through the vrm heatsink.

Even the ram chips on the backside of my bill of fare are much cooler now vs with stock cooling. This is because the card in itself (pcb) is much improve cooled and because I have heatsinks on the fries.

With the stock cooler I burnt my finger when holding on the RAM chips under load. With this cooler they are just a trivial bit warm to the bear on.

Even the vrm heatsinks are only warm to the touch, and non superhot. As I've said, the two fans are blowing through the Twin Turbo heatsink and cooling downward the card. As well, I have a sidecase fan bravado fresh air direct towards the card and feeding the Twin Turbo fans with fresh air. But even without this, the card is nice and cool.

So people, stop bold if you lot don't know.

And those stock coolers similar GTX 580 and 680'southward use, are the same principle as the coolers used for 8800GTX/Ultra. They accept heatplates with thermal pads covering all RAM fries, VRM'due south and all that stuff. This is in no mode a good solution. They trap more heat than actually cooling the chips. My all-time proof was with the 8800GTX, since it had so many sensors, I could monitor all temps.

It is much better to have a naked PCB with sinks on everything and fans blowing directly down on the PCB to absurd everything even better.

Had I inverse the stock cooler of my now dead Gigabyte GTX 570 (reference) carte du jour, to a good Arctic Accelero Cooler, I'm certain the card would have still been up and kicking. The card's pvm only overheated and burnt with the stock cooler (Same cooler as the reference GTX 580 and similar to many other stock coolers, with that heatplate and thermalpads covering the whole pcb).

And my old 8800GTX with the HR03 Plus I sold to a boy several years ago. He is still gaming on it very ofttimes. That card was bought in the beginning of 2007 if I remember correctly. I'thou sure that menu would have been dead a long time ago hadn't I changed cooler. I'thousand sure of it.

Apr 17, 2006

5,338

476

126

• #22

"And so people, stop assuming if y'all don't know."

The Golden Homo: My vram temps slightly increased when I used the Accellero on my 8800GT. I know, I checked. I made sure the passive heatsinks were cooled with a fan. Your experience may be different than mine.

My bespeak is to be careful with aftermarket coolers that you non think that but cooling the GPU volition do.

"It is much ameliorate to have a naked PCB with sinks on everything and fans bravado directly down on the PCB to cool everything even ameliorate."

A qualified yeah. IF the heatsinks are properly practical and good ones - yeah it makes a departure.

• #23

"And then people, stop assuming if you don't know."

The Aureate Human: My vram temps slightly increased when I used the Accellero on my 8800GT. I know, I checked. I made sure the passive heatsinks were cooled with a fan. Your experience may be dissimilar than mine.

My point is to be careful with aftermarket coolers that you not call up that merely cooling the GPU will do.

"It is much better to have a naked PCB with sinks on everything and fans bravado directly down on the PCB to cool everything even better."

A qualified yes. IF the heatsinks are properly applied and good ones - yes information technology makes a difference.

Did that 8800GT accept reference cooling? And what blazon of Accelero was it? I find it very strange you did get higher temps on the vram when using heatsinks and fans bravado on them.

• #24

I know of no enclosure that would fit a side panel on with that clunky, fugly cooler.

Daimon

• #25

Is the Mono Plus a dual or triple slot cooler? I have a 560Ti that was under water (replaced by a 670 ) and I need a cooler for it. Hoping to put it in a mITX build for my blood brother, but I retrieve a triple slot cooler volition be likewise large.

• Advertising
• Cookies Policies
• Privacy
• Term & Conditions
• Nearly us

• This site uses cookies to assist personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep y'all logged in if you register.
  By continuing to employ this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

Source: https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/arctic-accelero-mono-plus-installed-on-a-gtx-670-and-gtx-680-reference.2250251/

Posted by: shroyerplasoner.blogspot.com

Share this post